Continue reading...
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
"It can be a couple of months but it can also be a couple of years," he said. "If the jobs are really lost due to outsourcing or AI, then unless we find in a couple of years actually we still need those people and replacing them didn't work, then those jobs are gone."，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
I’d been using 1Password to store individual secrets for a while, pulling them one at a time with the CLI. Harrison took it a step further. “Why not store the whole .env file’s worth of secrets as fields in a single 1Password item?” he said. Simple. Obvious in hindsight. And it led me down a rabbit hole of rethinking how I handle secrets in every project.